Farm Acts: Infirming the Farmers: What next?

The dice is thrown. The farm bills are acts now. There are at least nine challenges of these twin acts in the agrarian world of India.


The dice is thrown. The farm bills are acts now. There are at least nine challenges of these twin acts in the agrarian world of India.

Here are they:

  1. The Acts do not guarantee the Minimum Support Prices of farm produce in the agricultural mandis at the MS Swaminathan Committee recommended formula of input costs plus 50%. The Acts in effect will make the mandis and the MSPs infructuous as there will be no farmer travelling to the mandisincurring more expenses when corporates can acquire crops from them from site of production. This will be further accentuated by the fact the contract farming will close all options of the farmers to trade on their produce elsewhere. Worthwhile to note that BJP in 2014 election manifesto had promised the implementation of the MS Swaminathan Committee report.
  2. In fact, they do not guarantee that the corporate procurements of produce from the farmers shall be at a higher rate than the MSPs, thereby keeping the small farmers at the mercy of large corporate houses. Decentralized agents- based procurement and mandi-based selling today, which also have many loopholes, will degenerate further into monopolistic corporate procurement where price negotiation will further disempower the farmers. During harvesting season, without any modern storage facility, the farmers are forced to sell their crops at the readily available prices, and prices usually crash in such situaations.
  3. Since cash crops (like cotton, jawar, mustard etc) give a far bigger profit margin than food crops (like paddy, wheat etc), the tendency of corporate houses indulging into contract farming and bulk buying shall be to produce and procure largely the cash crops. This is bound to create imbalance in food grains production, will give rise to famine, and render certain types of land inefficient for farming in the long run with income from such land going down. The case in point in the crisis that had emanated from the forced cultivation of Indigo by the imperialist British rulers in early 20 th century, leading to famine in eastern India.
  4. The private corporate houses shall be procuring farm produce directly from small and marginal farmers, or bringing them into contract farming, as a consequence of these two Acts. Obviously, they are not for charity. The farmers eking out a mere subsistence level survival will never have the financial and legal resources of the corporate houses and are bound to gradually lose out.
  5. These Acts are the death warrants of the APMC Mandis (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) all over India now which are the markets for all farm produce. By offering to buy directly from the farmers or bringing them under contract farming in pre-determined rates, the farmers will not use the mandiswhich will gradually close down. What was needed is a larger number of mandis closer to the farmers and an MSP with higher rates (inputs+50%),along with a strict implementation of the MSPs by the mandi managers. Noneof these were looked at and the interests of the large corporate houses upheld.If one to three largest corporate houses start procuring entire farm produce,the farmers will have no control over the prices of their produce ever again.

Also read: Champaran to Wallmart : Journey of Farmer

Today, according to Shanta Kumar Committee Report, only six percent of the farmers in the country are able to sell their crop at the minimum support priceset by the government in APMC mandis. The remaining 94% of the farmerssell their goods in the open market, often at lower costs, to various types ofmiddlemen, called Arthiyas in North and Central India. It is because more than 40,000 mandis are needed in the country, out of which only 7,500 exist. Farmers are afraid that the new laws will worsen the situation by killing eventhese few mandis existing.

  1. The Acts leave the storage, pricing and sell of the farm produce to thediscretion of the corporate houses that procure them. This legalize hoarding ofessential food materials, and creating artificial shortage in market to spikedemand and prices thereby profits by the corporate houses. This is how through hoarding several times famine type situations had happened in Indiabefore and after the independence. It was hence made illegal which the acts ineffect legalizes today. Famine, shortage, price hike, consumers’ interestsviolated are the outcome of such a policy.
  2. Concept of perfect competition in open market which is being eloquentlytouted as the biggest reason to celebrate the new acts, and which has beenrepeated by the PM in his Mann Ki Baat, is a misnomer when you look at theunequal resources and power of the competing corporate houses interested in farm produce trade, between the farmers and the corporate entities, andbetween the dying Mandis and the aggressive corporate conglomerates.
  3. The policy evolving through these acts is one of unsustainable environment asthere will be undue emphasis on cash crops, as there will be massive hoardingof essential food crops, and as there will be artificial chemical means toincrease productivity and show higher amount of crops produced from thesame piece of land. This is an anti-ecology policy of the government.
  4. Under the current open-ended procurement of rice and wheat, today FoodCorporation of India (FCI) is bound to buy all paddy and wheat producebrought to the mandis by the farmers at the MSPs set by the government.

Also read: India’s New Farm Bills: Are they Truly Anti-Farmer?

However, such protection are not there in the new Acts, and hence, neither thefarmers can get a minimum assured price, nor will there be assuredprocurement of the most essential food crops which can lead to breakdown ofthe food security regime of India.

Roadmap Ahead to Solve the Agrarian Crisis:

  1. First MS Swaminathan Committee suggestions must be the cornerstone intackling the agrarian crisis in India. Hence, fixing MSPs at input costs plus50% more for at least 23 crops must be done and adhered to. The APMC Mandis which are below 8000 now, merely 20% of what India needs, must beconstructed across India with Centra and State participation.
  2. Punjab and Haryana have developed the road network massively for benefit ofthe farmers transporting their crops, have developed so far more than 3000mandis and smaller markets, and the government and the farmers have alsoinvested in tractors and trucks massively. Hence, these two states coulddevelop as the rice and wheat bowl of India. Interestingly, the highest amountof farmers’ discontent after the new Acts has been in these states. Similarmeasures need to be taken in all other states. Some infra-structural growth inthis regard is seen in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Odisha provinces are lagging behind.
  3. Farmers’ own cooperatives to develop transporting infrastructure like trucksetc need to encouraged and developed and insistence should be on sellingtheir produce at the mandis based on the MSPs and not be at the mercy of bigindustrialists.
  4. MSP was initially legislated to be in 23 crops, but usually done in rice, wheat,and some pulses, and not on others. The government must procure crops atMSPs if not sold in the open market, put in FCI, and ensure their quicker salein the consumer markets after necessary processing.
  5. The contracts with the corporate houses must be based on MSP of themoment and the formula to reach it, focus should be on food crops mainly,and hoarding of food crops should not be allowed to jack up the prices in theconsumer market by the corporate hoarders.

The author is a regular columnist and the Pro Vice Chancellor of Adamas Universityof Kolkata.


BY: Professor Ujjwal K Chowdhury

Article Name
Farm Acts: Infirming the Farmers: What next?
The dice is thrown. The farm bills are acts now. There are at least nine challenges of these twin acts in the agrarian world of India.
Publisher Name
Publisher Logo