The Supreme Court today declined early hearing of petitions in the Ram Janmabhoomi–Babri Masjid title dispute case. A Bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S.K. Kaul said it had already listed the appeals before the appropriate bench in January.
Rejecting the request of early hearing of lawyer Barun Kumar Sinha, appearing for the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, the bench said “We have already passed the order. The appeals are coming up in January. Permission declined.”
Earlier, the apex court had fixed the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case for the first week of January before an “appropriate bench”, which will decide the schedule of hearing.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate C.S. Vaidyanathan, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government and deity Ram Lalla respectively, had sought early listing of the appeals in the case after referring to their long pendency.
- Related Articles:
- Ram temple not a poll issue for BJP, says Javadekar
- Plan in progress for 151-metre-tall statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya
- Supreme Court gets four new judges, strength rises from 24 to 28
- Police ask AMU to explain on revoked suspension of Kashmiri students
Earlier, a three-judge Bench, by a 2:1 majority, refused to refer to a five-judge Constitution Bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations in its 1994 judgment of the Allahabad High Court that a mosque was not integral to Islam. The matter had arisen during the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute.
The top court bench headed by the then Chief Justice Dipak Misra had said that the civil suit has to be decided on the basis of evidence. It had also said that the previous verdict has no relevance to this issue.
As many as 14 appeals have been filed against the high court judgement, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land be partitioned equally among three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.